- Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens.
Wednesday, July 09, 2008
thought for today
Tuesday, July 08, 2008
Bothering God
Why do any of us keep wishing for things we know won't happen?
Why do we keep tossing the coins of our hearts' desires into pools of still water that swallow them up without a sound?
If I had been prepared, I might have said something inspired about the difference between wishing and prayer, but I was not prepared. When I talk to Madeline about prayer, I want to make sure I tell her the truth about what she can expect. I want to say something she can test for herself, about how God loves her and listens
to her, but in that case I will need a ready explanation
for why it does not always
seem so.
I think I will skip the usual stuff about how no is a valid answer to prayer. As true as that may be, it sounds stingy to me.
Copyright 1999 CHRISTIAN CENTURY. Reproduced by permission from the Mr 24-31 1999, p 356 issue of the CHRISTIAN CENTURY. Subscriptions: $49/year from P.O. Box 378, Mt. Morris, IL 61054. 1-800-208-4097
Christian Century 116 no 10 Mr 24-31 1999, p 356. ISSN: 0009-5281. Related Record Number: ATLA0000159516
thought for today
Our Lord asks but two things of us; Love for [God] and for our neighbor. We cannot know whether we love God…but there can be no doubt about whether we love our neighbor or no.
- Teresa of AvilaInterior Castle
Monday, July 07, 2008
structurally humiliating women
Archbishop Williams said: "I am deeply unhappy with any scheme or any solution to this which ends up, as it were, structurally humiliating women who might be nominated to the episcopate."
I don't know who the good Abp could think that provisions restricting the authority of a bishop who happens to be a woman could be anything other than structurally humiliating.
On the road
"All the world's a stage . . .
"All the world's a stage . . .
from Telling Secrets by Elizabeth Kaeton
. . . and all this day, we've have front row center to the drama in the Church of England, meeting in Synod, to determine whether or not women can be ordained to the episcopacy."
First of all, I want to be clear that these remarks are my own on my own personal blog. I am not speaking in my official capacity as President of the Episcopal Women’s Caucus.
It’s not that I suspect my sisters and brothers on the board would disagree with me. It’s just that we haven’t had a chance, just yet, to discuss it as a community of leaders. We’ll do that later this evening in our monthly Board Conference Call.
I have been closely following the Church of England Synod debate over the ‘election’ of women to the episcopacy.
They have already agreed with the idea of women bishops.
Now, they are to vote on how to “accommodate” the minority who do not accept the idea or the presence of women in the episcopacy. By the time this is posted, the final vote may have already been taken.
Ruth Gledhill has been ‘live blogging’ here.
Thinking Anglicans is also updating here.
I know. You thought that was a done deal. Yes, they do ‘allow’ women to be ordained to the diaconate. Yes, for the past 15 years women have been ‘allowed’ to be ordained to the priesthood. But, for the past 15 years, women have not been allowed, in the Church of England, to be ‘appointed’ bishops.
Yes, that’s right. One is ‘appointed’ to the episcopacy in England, not elected in a diocese by clergy and laity as is our custom in The Episcopal Church. Which may be part of the problem.
No. Check that. Here’s the problem. It’s as old as the story of the Adam and Eve. It’s the ‘original sin’ of Paradise: sexism. You know: It's all Eve's fault.
It’s no surprise to me that the two issues confronting the church are the ordination of LGBT people and the last crack in the stained glass ceiling for women. Suzanne Pharr wrote about it in 1988 in her book, “Homophobia: A Weapon of Sexism.”
Yes, you got that right. 1988. I discovered it shortly after I got home from the last Lambeth Conference in 1988 where eleven bishops who are women were in attendance.
I have a very clear memory of the day that Lambeth Resolution which said that homosexuality was incompatible with scripture. The coalition of conservative American bishops and their Global South partners emerged from the meeting hall shouting, “V-I-C-T-O-R-Y”.
It was like being at a tail-gate party. The testosterone level was that high.
The American progressive bishops emerged looking like Bambi-in-the-headlights. I remember Martin Smith, then head of the Society of St. John the Evangelist (SSJE) who attended there with Bishop Tom Shaw (as both men were celibate monks, Martin joked that he was Tom’s “his most chaste spouse”), said that the images from Lambeth were, for him, like undeveloped film that would need to spend some time being soaked in baptismal water before any clarity emerged.
It’s hasn’t been that long since the entire process of picture-taking has been revolutionized by the technology of computer digitalization, but I think we used to call undeveloped film “negatives.” Right.
It didn’t take long for the negatives to emerge with greater clarity than anyone expected.
The very next day, the good bishops and primates came after women, passing a resolution which stated, “there is and should be no compulsion on any bishop in matters concerning the ordination or licensing” of women.
The resolution, entitled, “Unity of the Anglican Communion” was hammered out in private meetings between some women bishops and traditionalists and passed by 80%.
I know. It broke my heart when it didn’t blow my mind. And, it went downhill from there. I don’t know who wrote the prayer, but I remember praying the part about “help us from oppressing others or from participating in our own oppression.”
Suzanne Pharr defines patriarchy as “an enforced belief in male dominance and control”. She says patriarchy is the ideology and sexism the system that holds it in place.
Pharr further states: “The catechism goes like this:
Q: Who do gender roles serve?
A: Men and the women who seek power from them.
Q: Who suffers from gender roles?
A: Women most completely and men in part.
Q; How are gender roles maintained?
A: By the weapons of sexism: economics, violence and homophobia.”
Most of this catechism was written in the crucible of domestic violence where these three weapons were seen most clearly.
Pharr writes: “The stories of women battered by men, victims of sexism at its worst, show these three forces converging again and again.
read the rest of it here.
thought for today
Henry S. Haskins
Sunday, July 06, 2008
thought for today
"The word freedom comes from a Sanskrit word priyia, which in its verbal form means to love and to be loved and as a noun means "my beloved." Freedom is a relationship of mutual love; of the gift of self to another..."
Anthony Bloom
Saturday, July 05, 2008
thought for today
with greed comes
animosity, ignorance, pride,
thoughts of self-benefit and discontent.
loving-kindness, wisdom, humility,
thoughts of all others and great joy.
Ven. Shi Wuling, an American Buddhist nun
Friday, July 04, 2008
Thought for today
Abu Sa'id Ibn Abi'L-Khayr (Persian mystic and poet known for his service to the poor)
Thursday, July 03, 2008
Thought for today
“Christians have often disputed as to whether what leads the Christian home is good actions, or faith in Christ…It does seem to me like asking which blade in a pair of scissors is most necessary.”
C. S. Lewis
Wednesday, July 02, 2008
A stroll with Emma
You can see in this picture that she loves to try and feed herself and find that using feet and hands are most effective bottle handling techniques.
At this moment he is jumping around and cooing in her johnny jump up chair so I must be off to talk to her.
You can see more of Emma here.
Thought for today
"We are, each of us, angels with only one wing, and we can only fly embracing each other."
– Luciano Decrescenzo
Tuesday, July 01, 2008
thought for today
in war,
both the winners and losers
lose.
Ven. Shi Wuling, an American Buddhist nun
Monday, June 30, 2008
A nice blog to visit
Reflections after 5 years in prison ministry
It is hard to believe that I was involved in prison ministry at the State of Alaska' only maximum security prison for over 5 years. Time certainly does fly by. It is been interesting, challenging, frustrating, and rewarding, and sometimes all of these at the same time. I have worked with some wonderful and caring staff. And I have been blessed to see the lives of some prisoners truly transformed, partly I hope, through my presence and ministry among the men here. And of course I'm sure I have been taken advantage of and used as well, but I suppose that is true for all of ministry, perhaps just more prevalent here in prison.
I'm disappointed that the job is being terminated due to the decision of the legislature of our state to no longer fund the position. It is a reflection on the hard hearted attitudes in this state and is extremely shortsighted.
But as I have deal with the reality of loosing the position, I have also come to grips with how very stressful the job has been for me. To be honest I never imagined it would be quite that stressful, particularly since I have always felt that I was a pretty laid back, low stress person.
As I was thinking about stress in my life I realized something else. In my Coast Guard career I usually only spent 2 or so years at any job before being transferred to a new assignment. My five years at prison and seven years at St. Peter's represent the longest I have ever been at the same job. And I wonder that if, after 24 years of moving on over and over again, that perhaps just the idea of staying at the same thing (no matter how rewarding) is just not my cup of tea. Perhaps this contributed to my feelings of stress over the years.
I'm looking forward to the slightly less stressful job of becoming a maritime instructor this fall, sort of a return to my roots, while I wait to see what God may have in store for me for ministry in the future.
And I'm still hopeful to find another ministry opportunity out there somewhere and am trusting in God that something will work out in my future.
GAFCON
You can find the final statement here.
The Church Times Blog has links to the Archbishop of Canterbury and our own Presiding Bishop's responses here.
"You Raise Me Up"
When I am down and, oh my soul, so weary;
When troubles come and my heart burdened be;
Then, I am still and wait here in the silence,
Until you come and sit awhile with me.
You raise me up, so I can stand on mountains;
You raise me up, to walk on stormy seas;
I am strong, when I am on your shoulders;
You raise me up: To more than I can be.
You raise me up, so I can stand on mountains;
You raise me up, to walk on stormy seas;
I am strong, when I am on your shoulders;
You raise me up: To more than I can be.
There is no life - no life without its hunger;
Each restless heart beats so imperfectly;
But when you come and I am filled with wonder,
Sometimes, I think I glimpse eternity.
You raise me up, so I can stand on mountains;
You raise me up, to walk on stormy seas;
I am strong, when I am on your shoulders;
You raise me up: To more than I can be.
You raise me up, so I can stand on mountains;
You raise me up, to walk on stormy seas;
I am strong, when I am on your shoulders;
You raise me up: To more than I can be.
Thought for today
“The saint who advances on his knees never retreats.”
Elizabeth Elliott
“Shadow of the Almighty”
Sunday, June 29, 2008
thought for today
“I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.”
Xenocrates (396-314 BCE)
Saturday, June 28, 2008
Gay Marriage Is Good for America
By order of its state Supreme Court, California began legally marrying same-sex couples this week. The first to be wed in San Francisco were Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon, pioneering gay-rights activists who have been a couple for more than 50 years.
More ceremonies will follow, at least until November, when gay marriage will go before California's voters. They should choose to keep it. To understand why, imagine your life without marriage. Meaning, not merely your life if you didn't happen to get married. What I am asking you to imagine is life without even the possibility of marriage.
Re-enter your childhood, but imagine your first crush, first kiss, first date and first sexual encounter, all bereft of any hope of marriage as a destination for your feelings. Re-enter your first serious relationship, but think about it knowing that marrying the person is out of the question.
Imagine that in the law's eyes you and your soul mate will never be more than acquaintances. And now add even more strangeness. Imagine coming of age into a whole community, a whole culture, without marriage and the bonds of mutuality and kinship that go with it.
What is this weird world like? It has more sex and less commitment than a world with marriage. It is a world of fragile families living on the shadowy outskirts of the law; a world marked by heightened fear of loneliness or abandonment in crisis or old age; a world in some respects not even civilized, because marriage is the foundation of civilization.
Read it all here.Thanks to the blog Straight, Not Narrow for this.
thought for today
“Those who understand themselves as victims actually become victims of their own inability to act.”
Russell Preageant
“Engaging the New Testament”, p. 114
Friday, June 27, 2008
Thought for today
Some people think that the longer you can sit the wiser you must be. I have seen chickens sit on their nests for days on end.
Achaan Chah
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Schism on hold!
Threat of Anglican Schism Fizzles
The would-be Anglican rebels gathered with storm clouds brewing around them. But now, even though the conservative Global Anglican Future Conference (GAFcon) has not concluded its meeting in Jerusalem, the secession it threatened to bring to the 78 million-member Anglican Communion looks like a confused bust.
Read the entire article here.
The Chicago Consultation
Check out their web site here.
Our church's evolving attitude has led us to the point where we must consider gay marriage
Christians have always argued about marriage. Jesus criticised the Mosaic law on divorce, saying "What God has joined together let no man separate", but even that dictum appears in different versions in the Gospels, and was modified in the letters of Peter and Paul. Christians had to square the ecstatic sensuality of the Song of Songs with Paul's teaching that marriage was a fallen estate, useful primarily in saving those who could not be celibate from fornication.
This tension is indicative of the church's long struggle to reconcile the notion that sexuality is a gift from God with its deep suspicion of the pleasure of sex. As the historian Stephanie Coontz points out, the church did not bless marriages until the third century, or define marriage as a sacrament until 1215.You can find the entire article here.
Thought for today
if we persist, we will succeed,
if we give up, we will fail.
so often in a new endeavor
there is an initial burst of enthusiasm,
then routine activity...
boredom...
cessation.
with
determination,
the fire will burn strong.
Ven. Shi Wuling, an American Buddhist nun
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Poll results
37% voted for less painful
9% voted for more painful
27% never had root canal
27% wondered if they should even bother reading!
Thank to everyone who participated!
Back down on your knees
Benedict's master of liturgical ceremonies said in an interview Wednesday in the Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano that the pontiff will place the Communion host in the mouths of the faithful who kneel before him."
You can read it all here.
A Supranatural Sexuality: Further Problems for Those Who Argue 'from Nature'
| A Supranatural Sexuality: Further Problems for Those Who Argue 'from Nature' | [Jun. 19th, 2008|09:02 pm] |
| In my recent comments on homosexuality, I attempted to demonstrate that arguments based upon the 'naturalness', or lack thereof, of homosexuality cannot be based upon Gen 1-2, when we take those texts at face value. Rather, those who read Gen 1-2 as a condemnation of gay unions, tend to filter the text at hand through the lens of a particular (and rather simplistic) reading of Ro 1. According to these exegetes, Ro 1 suggests that homosexuality is unnatural, and therefore immoral. Now here is an interesting idea. Paul's comments about the 'unnatural' nature of homosexuality are based upon his experiences as an observant Jew, living within the diaspora, during the first century CE. From this perspective, I suspect that a case could be made that Paul's comments about what is 'natural' or 'unnatural' are based upon his observations of nature. That homosexuality would be considered 'unnatural' is just as obvious as, oh, the fact the men should have short hair and women should have long hair (1 Cor 11.14-15: "Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him, but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory?"). This leads to two further ideas. (1) Those who wish to cling to the 'natural' argument in Ro 1, need to demonstrate how this 'natural' argument is more significant, long-lasting, useful, or whatever, than the 'natural' argument Paul makes in 1 Cor 11. (Good luck with that!) (2) Those who wish to cling to the 'natural' argument in Ro 1, now do so against what we have observed in nature. Now this is interesting because, if I am correct that Paul believed that the unnaturalness of homosexuality was actually easily observable in nature, then this position risks contradicting itself. You see, it is now clear that (for many people) homosexuality is not a choice, and homosexuality has also been well documented within nature, and within the actions of other species. In response to these observations, those who wish to assert that homosexuality is 'unnatural' simply assert that these things are signs of the truly pervasive nature of the fall. But note what then occurs: (a) that which is 'natural' is increasingly defined by that which exists outside of the realm of nature -- and so talk of the 'natural' is increasingly supranatural (i.e. there is essentially no proof from nature -- say the discovery of a 'gay gene' or whatever -- which would then be convincing to those who hold this position); and (b) Paul's method of argumentation is reversed and, seemingly, discounted. Paul makes an argument based upon his observations of what appears to be obvious in nature, and now some Christians wish to affirm Paul's argument while simultaneously arguing that we should not make arguments based upon our observations of what appears to be obvious in nature! | |
The person for whom Jesus died
I Corinthians 8:11 And so by your knowledge this weak person is destroyed, the brother for whom Christ died. (ESV)
Who are we? We are the persons for whom Jesus died.
How do I view another Christian? As one thing: The person for whom Jesus died.
What measures all my actions towards another Christian? This is a person for whom Christ died.
What determines the definition of love as I will express it for brothers and sisters? This is the person for whom Jesus died.
What goes BEFORE anything our denominations have to say about one another? This is a person for whom Jesus Christ died.
Why do I have a place at the Lord’s Table? Because I am a person for whom Jesus died.
What is the foundation of every invitation from God and from his people? This is a person for whom Christ died.
Who am I? I am the person for whom Jesus died.
Who is God? He is Jesus Christ who died for me.
What is the Gospel? God was in Christ, reconciling the world to himself, by dying for you and for me. Believe this Good News and be found and loved by this God, along with all others for whom he died.
What comforts me in life and in death? That God loves me/the world so much, that Jesus died for me/the world.
Thought for today
Gerald G. May, M.D., "The Dark Night of the Soul"
Too funny!
The Dog's Diary
8:00 am - Dog food! My favorite thing!
9:30 am - A car ride! My favorite thing!
9:40 am - A walk in the park! My favorite thing!
10:30 am - Got rubbed and petted! My favorite thing!
12:00 pm - Milk bones! My favorite thing!
1:00 pm - Played in the yard! My favorite thing!
3:00 pm - Wagged my tail! My favorite thing!
5:00 pm - Dinner! My favorite thing!
7:00 pm - Got to play ball! My favorite thing!
8:00 pm - Wow! Watched TV with the people! My favorite thing!
11:00 pm - Sleeping on the bed! My favorite thing!
![]()
The Cat's Diary
Day 983 of My Captivity
My captors continue to taunt me with bizarre little dangling objects. They dine lavishly on fresh meat, while the other inmates and I are fed hash or some sort of dry nuggets. Although I make my contempt for the rations perfectly clear, I nevertheless must eat something in order to keep up my strength.
The only thing that keeps me going is my dream of escape. In an attempt to disgust them, I once again vomit on the carpet. Today I decapitated a mouse and dropped its headless body at their feet. I had hoped this would strike fear into their hearts, since it clearly demonstrates my capabilities. However, they merely made condescending comments about what a "good little hunter" I am. Bastards!

There was some sort of assembly of their accomplices tonight. I was placed in solitary confinement for the duration of the event. However, I could hear the noises and smell the food. I overheard that my confinement was due to the power of "allergies." I must learn what this means, and how to use it to my advantage.
Today I was almost successful in an attempt to assassinate one of my tormentors by weaving around his feet as he was walking. I must try this again tomorrow, but at the top of the stairs.
I am convinced that the other prisoners here are flunkies and snitches. The dog receives special privileges. He is regularly released, and seems to be more than willing to return. He is obviously retarded. The bird must be an informant. I observe him communicate with the guards regularly. I am certain that he reports my every move. My captors have arranged protective custody for him in an elevated cell, so he is safe. For now ...Tuesday, June 24, 2008
You've Been Left Behind
Of course you have to count on the people running this site to be actually raptured for the system to work. Or perhaps if a few of the workers find themselves unfortunately left behind they might send out the messages manually.
Thanks to Letters from Kamp Krusty for pointing out this jewel.
GAFCON, the Anglican Communion, and does anyone really care
But I have to ask, does it really matter? The folks in my former parish never really cared or were even aware of all the machinations going on. Not because they are ignorant or don't have an opinion (trust me many of them definitely have opinions!), but because the truth of the matter is that the Anglican Communion is not all that important. What matters to them is what we are doing to share the love of Jesus in our community and in the world.
I don't think the folks at St. Peter's really are all that worked up about the future of the Anglican Communion, because they know that St. Peter's will continue to love people and to try to feed the poor and visit the sick.
I really wish others would recognize that is what is really important too. I wonder how many mouths would have been fed by all the money put into GAFCON.
He Reigns
its the song of every teen, rising from the african plain
its the song of the forgiven, drowning out the amazon rain
the song of asian believers, filled with gods holy fire
its every child, every tongue, every nation, A love some born of a grateful choir
its all gods children singing glory glory, hallelujah he reigns, he reigns
its all gods children singing glory glory, hallelujah he reigns, he reigns
let it rise above above the forewinds, caught up in the heavenly sound
let praises echo from the towers of cathedral, to the faithful tethered underground
of all the songs sung forth the dawn of creation, some were meant to persist
of all the bells rung from a thousand steeples, none rings true'r than this
its all gods children singing glory glory, hallelujah he reigns, he reigns
its all gods children singing glory glory, hallelujah he reigns, he reigns
its all gods children singing glory glory, hallelujah he reigns, he reigns
its all gods children singing glory glory, hallelujah he reigns, he reigns
and all the powers of darkness, tremble at what they've just heard
cause all the powers of darkness, cant drown out a single word
when all gods children sing out glory glory, hallelujah he reigns, he reigns
all gods children sing out glory glory, hallelujah he reigns, he reigns
all gods people singing glory glory, hallelujah he reigns, he reigns
all gods people singing glory glory, hallelujah he reigns, he reigns
glory glory, glory glory
glory glory hallelujah, he reigns
your my glory, your my glory, your my glory
oh glory glory, glory glory, glory glory
He reigns
Thought for today
“Remember that almost all of the Bible was written to and for communities and is still best read in a community. As we study the Bible with others, we gain a deeper and broader understanding from their insights – and they will gain from ours.”
Christopher L. Webber
“Welcome to the Episcopal Church”, p. 57
Monday, June 23, 2008
Thought for today
when others hurt us,
we usually react with
anger,
resentment,
and may even wish for retaliation.
but these actions will only prolong our pain,
for to hold resentment in our hearts
only serves to make us feel worse.
Ven. Shi Wuling, an American Buddhist nun
Sunday, June 22, 2008
The Venerable Wuling
thought for today
"To the attentive eye, each moment of the year has its own beauty, and in the same field, it beholds every hour, a picture which was never seen before and which shall never be seen again."
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Saturday, June 21, 2008
Bumper stickers
PARTING THOUGHTS: Spotted on Bumper Stickers
“Dear God, please help me be the person my dog thinks I am”
“If God can make it on 10%, why not the government?”
“In case of Rapture, I claim your car.”
“My boss is a Jewish Carpenter”
“If you love God tithe. Anyone can honk’”
thought for today
contentment is born of the capacity
to love impartially
to listen uncritically
to give unconditionally
to forgive unreservedly
to laugh at oneself unaffectedly.
Ven. Shi Wuling, an American Buddhist nun
Thursday, June 19, 2008
On using gendered pronouns for God
I thought we had progressed further than this. In the comments to my final post on the Envision conference, some people criticized me for advocating the removal of gendered pronouns in relation to God. They argued that this was implicitly a rejection of the revealed triune name of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Whenever I hear this kind of argument, I reminded of how much re-education still needs to happen in the church.
The fact of the matter is that the name “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit” has nothing whatsoever to do with gender. God is neither male nor female, because God is not a creature. God is qualitatively different from anything created, and that means the distinctions between male and female, old and young, black and white, have no bearing on God’s being. Even when God takes on the humanity of Jesus, this does not mean God only takes up the male sex. That would be heretical, tantamount to saying that God only died for men, not for women. The humanity of Jesus is concrete, yes, but a concrete universal—the humanity of all people. This is why the Roman Catholic insistence upon male clergy on the basis of Jesus’ maleness (and the sex of the disciples) is fundamentally mistaken: it elevates the particular attributes of Jesus as a male human over the attributes of his salvific significance. The only attribute significant in terms of his identity as the Savior of the world is the attribute of “human nature,” not “male humanity.”
At the end of the day, interpreting the name “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit” in gendered terms is equivalent to interpreting anthropomorphic imagery about, for example, the “hand of God” as if God actually has a hand. The Bible is full of anthropomorphic talk about God, but that does not mean God is just a Big Human in the sky. Similarly, the revealed name of the Trinity as “Father, Son, and Spirit” should not lead us to the mistaken impression that God is simply a human father raised to the level of infinite perfection and then projected upon the face of the divine. Nor is the Son of God simply a human son raised to the level of infinite perfection. (As always, we face the perennial problem: what is the gender of the Spirit?)
I am not arguing that we should jettison anthropomorphic imagery of God. The fact of the matter is that all human speech about God is necessarily anthropomorphic. As humans, we cannot speak about God in non-anthropomorphic language. We only know creaturely reality, so such talk is inescapable. But we cannot interpret such language literally or univocally. To do so would only be a denial of God’s divinity. It would mean reducing God to the level of a being within the world. It would be to adopt the metaphysical idea of God that Feuerbach already unmasked as a human projection, an idealized human being. According to Feuerbach, “The divine being is nothing else than the human being, or, rather, the human nature purified, freed from the limits of the individual man, made objective—i.e., contemplated and revered as another, distinct being. All the attributes of the divine nature are, therefore, attributes of the human nature.” In the end, Feuerbach realizes that such knowledge of God is only “man’s knowledge of himself, of his own nature.” When we ascribe gendered pronouns to God as if they are actually descriptive of who God is in Godself, then we fall prey to Feuerbach’s critique. We succumb to metaphysical thinking about God.
Am I saying that gendered pronouns are absolutely unacceptable? No. God had to become a specific gender in the incarnation, and it happened to be that God became a man. Does this mean that one gender is superior to the other, or that one gender is more a part of God’s being than another? Absolutely not! But it does mean that gendered pronouns are, in a certain, inescapable. When we talk about Jesus, we are talking about God. My argument was really about being courteous to those who seek to excise gendered pronouns when speaking about God, about the divine. While I personally strive to never use gendered pronouns because of the possible misinterpretation that God is somehow male or related more to men than women, I do not disparage those who choose to use such language, as long as they use it critically and responsibly.
Where I get frustrated is when people think that somehow male pronouns are privileged over female pronouns. That is nonsense. We can and should be able to speak about God as a “she” just as much as a “he.” Either gender is anthropomorphic in nature, and thus does not apply to God’s actual being, because God is not a creature. We speak as humans to humans, and we need to be aware of the limitations of our speech when we talk about God. Failure to do so is to fall into idolatry: to make God like us, or, even worse, like me.
Thought for today
Isaac of Nineveh (8th century Syrian bishop, theologian, and solitary monk)
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Presidential candidates and their faith poll
QUESTIONS THAT HAUNT ME!
QUESTIONS THAT HAUNT ME!
Why do you have to "put your two cents in"... but it's only a "penny for your thoughts"? Where's that extra penny going to?
Once you're in heaven, do you get stuck wearing the clothes you were buried in for eternity?
Why does a round pizza come in a square box?
What disease did cured ham actually have?
How is it that we put man on the moon before we figured out it would be a good idea to put wheels on luggage?
Why is it that people say they "slept like a baby" when babies wake up like every two hours?
If a deaf person has to go to court, is it still called a hearing?
Why are you IN a movie, but you're ON TV?
Why do people pay to go up tall buildings and then put money in binoculars to look at things on the ground?
Why do doctors leave the room while you change? They're going to see you naked anyway.
Why is 'bra' singular and 'panties' plural?
Why do toasters always have a setting that burns the toast to a horrible crisp, which no decent human being would eat?
If Jimmy cracks corn and no one cares, why is there a stupid song about him?
Can a hearse carrying a corpse drive in the carpool lane?
If the professor on Gilligan's Island can make a radio out of a coconut, why can't he fix a hole in a boat?
Why does Goofy stand erect while Pluto remains on all fours?
They're both dogs!
If Wile E. Coyote had enough money to buy all that ACME crap, why didn't he just buy dinner?
If corn oil is made from corn, and vegetable oil is made from vegetables, what is baby oil made from?
If electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from morons?
Do the Alphabet song and Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star have the same tune?
Why did you just try singing the two songs above?
Why do they call it an asteroid when it's outside the hemisphere, but call it a hemorrhoid when it's in your butt?
Did you ever notice that when you blow in a dog's face, he gets mad at you, but when you take him for a car ride, he sticks his head out the window?
Do you ever wonder why you gave me your e-mail address in the first place?
Save the Earth... it's the only planet with chocolate!!!!
From Doug a good while back. I'll bet he forgot that he ever sent them.
I hope the Mad One comes back soon, as I'm running out of steam.
Thought for today
Trees, flowers, grass grow in silence.
See the stars, moon, and sun
how they move in silence.
Mother Teresa of Calcutta
The Rector Speaks: Why I blessed a gay relationship
The Rector Speaks: Why I blessed a gay relationship
Dr. Martin Dudley, the rector of St Bartholomew the Great in the City of London, in the eye of storm over gay 'marriage', explains why he decided he must bless a gay relationship.
For today’s Church of England it is as if the 1970s never existed; the lessons have been forgotten. There has been a retreat from exploring the depths, pushing the boundaries to the point where words strain, crack and sometimes break as we struggle to express in a suffering world the foolishness of God and the all-embracing love found in Jesus Christ
There has been a return to uncritical fundamentalist use of biblical “proof texts”, ripping verses from their theological and literary contexts. There has been a flight to the safety of rigid law and inflexible dogma and a consequent desire to unchurch those who will not conform.
So on a day late in 2007 when my friend and colleague Peter Cowell asked me to bless the civil partnership that he was to contract with David Lord in May this year I was ready to answer “yes”. I did so not to provoke the so-called traditionalists and to deliberately disregard the guidelines published by the English House of Bishops, not to defy the Bishop of London, whose sagacity I respect, or Archbishop Rowan, who I have known and admired for 25 years, but because to respond in any other way would have been a negation of everything I believe, of everything that makes me who I am, as a man and as a priest.Read the rest of the article here.
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
It makes one wonder
As I have been enjoying the blessing of Emma in our lives and home it is hard to image anyone would be capable of injuring or killing a little child. And yet it has happened before and will unfortunately happen again.
And of course children are killed by starvation every day in the world, in spite of the world (and us that means) having the means to change this.
Thought for today
“… God did not simply call us into being, but continually has expectations of us.”
“…our task is to repair and perfect God’s creation.”
Susannah Heschel
Monday, June 16, 2008
An Inerrant Bible
"We believe the Holy Bible consisting of the Old and New Testament Scriptures to be the verbally inspired Word of God, the final authority for faith and life, inerrant in the original writings, and infallible"
While this is a pretty common statement found in most conservative/fundamentalist churches (and probably many of the emergent/missional churches as well), what they fail to address is that minor little problem of no original writings being in existence. I don't understand how it even makes sense to make this statement with no original writings around and none likely to be found.
They go on to say: "the Bible is our tool to know and understand who God is according to His own self-description; it is our tool to grow in faith and maturity and to learn the promises that God has given us. We take it literally. God's truth is the anchor for our souls. It calls us to dive deep into God and there discover His blessings and the transformation He brings to our lives, our church, and our world."
I do agree with this (except for the taking it literally part). God's truth surely is the anchor for our souls.
The Episcopal Church Welcomes You
Let Me Worship as I Am
From a young age I felt called to Christ. But as a gay man, I took a long time to find my spiritual home.
In October 2005 I took the soup. To an Irish Catholic, "taking the soup" means going to the other side, turning Protestant. During the famine years, one could get a bowl of soup if one sat through a Protestant service, which meant automatic excommunication in those pre-ecumenical days. So the slang was born, implying desertion of the One True Church in order to make life easier.
I suppose what I took wasn't soup, but it was comfort. I took a life steeped in the mystery and rhythm of the church along with what I hoped was a life with the integrity of being an open, practicing gay man. When I turned to the Episcopal Church, I saw a Christianity that was alive and evolving, one that delighted in difference and saw God's creation in many things, including women and openly gay men serving as priests and bishops.Read the entire article here.
Thought for today
may hatred yield to compassion,
may war surrender to peace.
Ven. Shi Wuling, an American Buddhist nun
Sunday, June 15, 2008
The Naked Liturgist
And thanks to Chuck over at the blog A Guy in the Pew for posting this gem!
Saturday, June 14, 2008
Your political compass
Thought for today
“To the question, Who is my neighbor? I reply as my Master did by the example that He gave: ‘the alien and the heretic.’”
Frederick W. Robertson
Saddleback Church and gays
Rick Warren Welcomes Gays to His Church--Oops, Never Mind
Here is one link to that story passed on by SNN reader Mark:
However, Rev. Warren issued this clarification, reported at the bottom of the story linked above:
Following news of the plan by gay fathers to attend Saddleback Church this coming Sunday, the church’s pastor, Rev. Rick Warren, has issued a statement clarifying the church’s role. “We did not invite this group, and I will not be meeting with them,” he said, adding that he had a previous commitment and would not be in church on Sunday.
The stern tone of this statement was very disappointing. It seems the Purpose Driven Life author sees no purpose in meeting with members of the GLBT faith community. What a shame and an opportunity lost.
Remaking Jesus in our own image
The above paragraph was taken from a rather long post at the blog of The Fire and the Rose. But I was struck by the truth of this particular observation. I think all of us need to be concerned about the problem of wanting to make Jesus in an image that particularly speaks to us. Not that I think that in itself is wrong, but it becomes wrong when that is the only image we can see of Jesus.
Thursday, June 12, 2008
I'm lagging behind!
Be sure to give them my email address when you sign up (episcopalpadre@gmail.com) so I get my credit!
| The Episcopal Public Policy Network Policy Alert | |
| | |
Dear Robert,
| |
1-800-228-0515, (202) 547-7300, FAX (202) 547-4457
On the Web: www.episcopalchurch.org/eppn
Email: eppn@episcopalchurch.org
Thought for today
the wilting flower,
tenderness restores
the grieving heart.
Ven. Shi Wuling, an American Buddhist nun
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Arctic synod says recent same-sex blessing votes hurt church unity
The synod of the diocese of the Arctic, meeting in Iqaluit, Nunavut from May 27 to June 3, passed a motion criticizing decisions by four dioceses of the Anglican Church of Canada that support blessing same-sex unions.
“Synod expressed great disappointment as some diocesan synods have decided to move forward with approving the blessing of same-sex civil marriages, after General Synod 2007 (made) it clear that this would not be allowed until the Lambeth Conference had time to discuss the issues this summer,” said a press release issued by the diocese of the Arctic synod. “This then indicates that Canadians are not serious about unity elements that hold the church together.”
It also passed a motion expressing “strong support … for those in the Southern cone dioceses, recognizing them as members of the Anglican Communion.”
Read it all here.But of course since it is not the Synod of the Diocese of the Arctic that gets to recognize who is and who is not a member of the Anglican Communion, their recognition doesn't really matter a whole lot.
CS Lewis
"Then I fell at his feet and thought, Surely this is the hour of death, for the Lion (who is worthy of all honour) will know that I have served Tash all my days and not him. Nevertheless, it is better to see the Lion and die than to be Tisroc of the world and live and not to have seen him. But the Glorious One bent down his golden head and touched my forehead with his tongue and said, Son, thou art welcome. But I said, Alas, Lord, I am no son of thine but the servant of Tash. He answered, Child, all the service thou hast done to Tash, I account as service done to me. Then by reasons of my great desire for wisdom and understanding, I overcame my fear and questioned the Glorious One and said, Lord, is it then true, as the Ape said, that thou and Tash are one? The Lion growled so that the earth shook (but his wrath was not against me) and said, It is false. Not because he and I are one, but because we are opposites, I take to me the services which thou hast done to him. For I and he are of such different kinds that no service which is vile can be done to me, and none which is not vile can be done to him. Therefore if any man swear by Tash and keep his oath for the oath's sake, it is by me that he has truly sworn, though he know it not, and it is I who reward him. And if any man do a cruelty in my name, then, though he says the name Aslan, it is Tash whom he serves and by Tash his deed is accepted. Dost thou understand, Child? I said, Lord, thou knowest how much I understand. But I said also (for the truth constrained me), Yet I have been seeking Tash all my days. Beloved, said the Glorious One, unless thy desire had been for me thou shouldst not have sought so long and so truly. For all find what they truly seek."
An interesting side note. As I was looking for those quote, I found it in all places at a Fundamentalist Baptist web site which is devoted to warning people of the dangers of CS Lewis. I would post the link here, but I really don't want to encourage people to go there! :)
CS Lewis has a very generous understanding of grace as demonstrated in this passage.
Thought for today
“But thus do I counsel you, my friends: distrust all in whom the impulse to punish is powerful!”
Friedrich Nietzsche
Duck Noodle Gang
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Nature or nuture?
"To the best of my knowledge, there is no scientific study that proves that people are born homosexual," he said. "There is no genetic link that has been discovered. In regard to God creating people homosexual in orientation, Matthew 19 makes a strong case against such an argument. Jesus said, 'Haven’t you read, that at the beginning the Creator made them male and female, and said, "For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh?" So they are no longer two but one.'"
I'm appalled at such an attitude from an Episcopal Bishop. While he is correct in his claim that no scientific study proves that people are born homosexual, neither is there any scientific evidence they we are not.
If Bishop Love really believes our sexuality is a choice, I invite him to choose homosexuality for a while and walk in our shoes. I suspect that he will find that kind of choice rather difficult. Shame on him for thinking it is so easy for me.
Billboards
Billboards!
Church growth vs. stealing sheep
The article is a good wake up call for many.
Thought for today
"When a man finds that it is his destiny to suffer, he will have to accept his suffering as his task; his single and unique task. He will have to acknowledge the fact that even in suffering he is unique and alone in the universe. No one can relieve him of his suffering or suffer in his place. His unique opportunity lies in the way in which he bears his burden."
Viktor E. Frankl
The End is Near!
I find it rather amusing that people actually find time to do things like this. Just to save you from looking the Rapture Index is currently above the highest level meaning, I assume, that the Rapture is just around the corner.
The amazing thing is that they have even taken steps to make sure that the web site remains active after the Rapture, although there are no provisions for someone staying behind to update it!
Although, they postulate that those of us Christians who do not believe in the Rapture will indeed be left behind, so I will put maintaining the Rapture Index on my to-so list!
What I really wish is that people would pour as much energy into bringing about the kingdom of God now rather than wasting their time on trivial pursuits like this.
Monday, June 09, 2008
A poem for Emma
Barring a miracle, Emma will be leaving Emmanuel and me for a new home on June 18th.
Emma
god came to me in the form of a child
in a most unexpected way and time
she cooed and she cried
her smile brightened my life
i was affected in ways i never imagined
and my life has been changed forever
then just like that
in a flash she is gone
and a hole is left in my heart
empty and void
she will probably never remember me
having been moved to a new home so young
but i will never forget her face
or the love she brought to my life
Thought for today
do not mistake
the reflection of the moon in the water
for the moon.
Ven. Shi Wuling, an American Buddhist nun
Saturday, June 07, 2008
The pain of life
I'm struggling right now with the very hard news that Emmanuel received yesterday. He learned that Emma will be going to a new home on June 18th (her four month birthday). I have been struggling with the possibility of loosing her for quite some time now, but the finality of it all has brought the pain to a more intense level. I had been so looking forward to spending days with her in July when I was supposed to start caring for her while Emmanuel was at work. I had envisioned stroller trips where we would be walking around town visiting.
And now all that has come crashing down. Emmanuel is naturally devastated.
While I'm happy we were able to give her such a great start in life for her first four months, I'm quite frankly angry and God and the system for now cruelly taking her away.
Laid off
On the good news front, I had an excellent interview for a job as Maritime Instructor (a return to my earlier roots) and they are waiting to hear if the Coast Guard will approve me as an instructor. If they do, I should be starting that new job in the Fall.
While it is a bitter disappointment to loose the Chaplain position I'm excited about the possibility of moving on to this new position.
Somehow I know that God is at work in all of this.
Friday, June 06, 2008
concupiscence
Thursday, June 05, 2008
Thought for today
may all beings
become messengers of peace
in times of chaos and conflict.
may they
become the calm voice of reason
in times of anguish and anger.
Ven. Shi Wuling, an American Buddhist nun
Wednesday, June 04, 2008
Calif. court refuses to stay gay marriage ruling
AP reports:
SAN FRANCISCO - California's highest court Wednesday refused to stay its decision legalizing same-sex marriage in the state, clearing the final hurdle for gay couples to start tying the knot this month.
Conservative religious and legal groups had asked the California Supreme Court to stop its May 15 order requiring state and local officials to sanction same-sex unions from becoming effective until voters have the chance to consider the issue in November. The justices' decisions typically become final after 30 days.
Read it all here.
Tuesday, June 03, 2008
Dark night of the soul
I was struck by the power of this thought. I have been coming to grips with my own efforts of "compulsively trying to control" my life and my circumstances. While I hardly know if I'm in the middle of a dark night of my soul, I do know that I want to work on making the transition he is speaking about in my own life.
Thought for today
those we love
those we know.
eventually we will even care for
those we do not like
those we do not know.
Ven. Shi Wuling, an American Buddhist nun
How to pick a Primate of your very own
Meanwhile, a former Canadian Anglican bishop who is now licensed by the Southern Cone said that the network contacted other foreign primates as possible leaders but aligned itself with the British-born Archbishop Venables because of his background.
“We did talk to a couple of primates of different colours,” said Bishop Donald Harvey, formerly of the diocese of Eastern Newfoundland and Labrador, in an interview. But Archbishop Venables was willing to take on the job, is well respected by other primates, and brings few cultural barriers and no language limitations, he said.
End of snippet.
But I have a suggestion. The best primate if you are shopping for one to jump to so you can "have it your way" so to speak, would be a dead one. Then you not only don't have to worry about cultural barriers, language limitations, or racism and even better you don't have to worry about the troublesome issue of someone potentially telling you what you have to do!
Monday, June 02, 2008
Oblivion is bliss, or is it?
Imagine all the time I could have saved myself if I would have learned this simple little trick. Who ever thought of it, and who knows about it and why did they never tell me? Perhaps I'm just an overly oblivious person (ok, no perhaps about it, I really am an oblivious person). I think someone should write one of those "Dummy" books for us oblivious people to help clue us in!
Sunday, June 01, 2008
Thought for today
Yiddish proverb
Just Emma and me
Emmanuel headed off (with much trepidation) to an Elton John concert this Friday and left Emma in my care for the night. He bravely only had to call and check up on us twice and I happily report that Emma and I had a wonderful time. Thanks to our friend Deborah who came over with pizza and ice cream for dinner (alas, only formula for Emma though!).
Emma survived with no apparent ill effects and I really enjoyed taking care of her.
And if you want to see many more pictures of this beautiful angel you can see them here.
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Thought for the day
we need to understand,
before we can understand,
we need to listen,
before we can listen,
we need to be quiet.
Ven. Shi Wuling, an American Buddhist nun
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Religion and politics
Perhaps religion should just be left out of politics.
By Ed Stoddard - Analysis
DALLAS (Reuters) - Republican presidential candidate John McCain has a "Religious Right" problem. His likely Democratic rival, Barack Obama, has a Rev. Wright problem.
In a country where high levels of belief and church attendance often translate into a major role for religion in election campaigns, analysts say faith may well be a poisoned chalice for the likely contenders in the November White House race.
The faith problem for Obama, who would be the first black president and is within striking distance of the Democratic nomination, stems from voter anger over anti-American sermons by his former pastor the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
Wright has said the September 11 attacks were retribution for U.S. foreign policy and the U.S. government had a hand in spreading AIDS to harm blacks.
Obama has publicly severed ties with Wright but opinion polls persistently show the relationship matters to some voters.
McCain's trouble lies with the Republican Party's conservative evangelical base, the so-called Religious Right, which rallied behind President George W. Bush but has been less than enthusiastic about McCain because of his past support for stem-cell research and his failure to back a federal ban on gay marriage.
"The religious right challenge to McCain is far more significant and problematic for his candidacy than the Rev. Wright problem for Obama. The reason is because religiously committed Christians are fundamental to a Republican winning the White House," said Michael Lindsay, a political sociologist at Rice University in Houston and a noted expert on faith and politics.
"That is not the case for Democratic candidates, in fact quite the opposite. The so-called secularist wing of American politics is part of the core of Democratic support and especially Obama support," he said.
But that does not mean Obama can exorcise the ghost of Wright, and Lindsay said it could haunt him in swing states -- those states that often switch from one party to the other and where the margin of victory in presidential elections is often narrow.
"I think the Wright controversy will continue to plague Obama's candidacy in swing states where religious voters can make a difference like Missouri, Ohio and Pennsylvania."
Polls of voters taken after Tuesday's Kentucky Democratic primary, which Hillary Clinton won easily in what many see as one of her last stands, showed that more than 50 percent of those who voted thought Obama shared Wright's views.
This highlights the scope of the Wright problem for Obama among Clinton's white, working class and often church-going supporters in swing states -- voters who could be up for grabs in an Obama-McCain showdown.
CAN MCCAIN REAP THE WRIGHT STUFF?
But can McCain reap what Wright has sown?
Many of the conservative evangelicals whom McCain needs to woo are staunchly patriotic and are enraged by Wright's inflammatory statements. That could help divert attention from McCain's perceived drawbacks.
"I don't think the McCain campaign will dwell on it but the rest of the Republican machinery will try and keep the Rev. Wright controversy at a low boil," said Cal Jillson, a political analyst at Southern Methodist University in Dallas.
McCain also has positions and qualities that many conservative Christians find appealing, such as his consistent opposition to abortion and his status as a military hero and former prisoner of war in Vietnam.
But Obama's ease at talking about his personal faith -- a trait he shares with Bush -- stands in stark contrast to McCain's obvious discomfort with the subject.
McCain attends a church affiliated with America's largest evangelical denomination, the Southern Baptist Convention, but he was raised in the more reserved embrace of the Episcopal faith. Obama is an adult convert to the United Church of Christ and the convert's passion gels easily with his speaking style.
"The political problem Obama faces (because of Wright) can be solved by personalizing the issue of faith," Jillson said.
Obama's campaign also has a faith outreach program aimed at religious voters, which helps dispel false rumors that he is a Muslim.
Clyde Wilcox of Georgetown University in Washington said he saw the Wright issue fading but it has still hurt "because there are people who are looking for a reason to doubt him (Obama) ... But Obama can survive this, he talks so very well about religion and has forcibly distanced himself (from Wright)."
(Editing by Eric Beech)
Obscurity of the dark night
I think one thing true in my own life, is that I often see things much clearer in hindsight. I supposed I might have lived a better and more effective life if I could see things as clearly at the beginning as at the end, but that does not seem to very true in my life.
Of course, I have also learned that sometimes I never seem to see things clear at all until much later, and sometimes perhaps too late. But I'm counting on God to continue to work with and through me and to grant me new insights and new visions as to what the future holds for me.





